The liberal publication The Cut, which published a comprehensive interview with Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, in August, has just written an article attacking King Charles. The article was posted online on Wednesday.
The newest article from the New York Magazine branch, which was published days before the Queen’s burial, is headed “King Charles’s Reign of Fussiness Has Begun.”
According to the story, Charles reportedly had two “tantrums” in the days after the death of his mother. A pen allegedly spilled on him at a signing ceremony in Northern Ireland, according to one account, while another said that he rushed out of the event while “trussed up in tails and shouting at palace officials who failed to clear a pen tray off his table with proper speed.”
The monarch seemed to signal his helpers to clear some space off his crowded desk.
The Cut continues by citing a Guardian article that said Charles decided to inform over 100 staff that he was firing them while he was getting ready to move into Buckingham Palace and at a funeral ceremony for his mother. Everyone is tremendously furious, especially the top team and private secretaries, a source told the publication.
Prior to resigning from their positions as leading royals and relocating to North America, Markle told the Cut in August that she and Prince Harry were “glad” to leave Britain and were “upsetting the dynamic of the hierarchy… simply by existing.”
The piece ends with one of Meghan Markle’s many unsubstantiated accusations against Charles, claiming he was prejudiced against her son Archie and accused him of treating his wife, Princess Diana, with “mundane brutality.”
The Cut notably published an article headlined “I Won’t Cry Over the Death of a Violent Oppressor” not long after the Queen passed away.
Uju Anya, a professor of linguistics at Carnegie Mellon, was interviewed for the essay. On Thursday, Anya tweeted: “I heard the main king of a thieving, raping, murderous empire is finally dying.”
May her suffering be unbearable.
The Queen, according to Anya, “represents the worship of white femininity,” according to the Cut.
Launched in 2008 as a section on the online of New York Magazine, The Cut became a separate entity in 2012. It is owned by Vox Media, a company known for its Thrillist, Eater, and The Verge publications.
It has published content that has since been taken down, including a 2018 article that called Priyanka Chopra a “global scam artist” in reference to her relationship with Nick Jonas and an open forum for disseminating unverified allegations of sexual misconduct by men in the media industry.
Anya, a professor of applied linguistics at the University of Pittsburgh, was born in Trinidad to a Trinidadian mother and a Nigerian father.
She claimed to be “a child of colonialism” and said that Britain’s involvement in the Nigerian Civil War had impacted her worldview, according to NBC News.
My earliest recollections are of living in a war-torn environment, and even now, reconstruction is still ongoing, she said.
She defended her anti-monarchy comments and said that the Queen was not above the choices the British government made, which “she monitored.”
Anya said that “Queen Elizabeth was a symbol of the religion of white femininity.”
As if she resided in this location or area in the imagination, this public image, as someone who didn’t have a role in the slaughter of her Crown, there is this idea that she was this tiny-old-lady grandmother type with her little hats and bags and small dogs and everything.
The Cut quoted Markle as saying in August that the pair did not want “reinventing the wheel” while requesting financial independence.
Additionally, Harry was quoted in the paper as saying that certain members of the Royal Family “aren’t able to work and live together,” and Meghan disclosed that her husband had claimed to have “lost” his father, Prince Charles.
Additionally, Meghan stated: “I’m going back… on Instagram,” and Davies referred to “her eyes as alight and mischievous.” Prior to her 2018 wedding to Harry, Meghan deleted all of her social media accounts. The sentence “Later, Meghan would express she was no longer confident she would truly return to Instagram” appears farther down in the story.
And Meghan said that in 2019 she had a conversation with a South African cast member of The Lion King in London, who had stated to her: “When you married into this family, we cheered in the streets much as we did when Mandela was released from jail.”
Before resigning from their positions as leading royals and relocating to North America, Meghan remarked that she and Prince Harry were “glad” to leave Britain and were “upsetting the dynamic of the hierarchy… simply by existing.”
People Will Accuse Meghan Markle of Lying About Anything, The Cut said in a story before to the publication of their interview. That article discussed Markle’s assertion that there had been a fire in Archie’s room before the former Royal couple attended a function, and it highlighted several critics who claimed that Markle had exaggerated the incident.
Despite the fact that none of these royals are mentioned in the article, The Cut stated today that 41-year-old Meghan cited a “handful of princes and princesses and dukes who had the precise arrangement they desired.”
In response, Meghan remarked, “That, for whatever reason, is not something that we were permitted to do, even though numerous other members of the family do that same thing,” in an interview with New York-based features writer Allison P Davis.
She just responded, “Why do you think that is?,” when asked why she thought it was. According to the interviewer Davis, she did so “straight back with a side-eye that says I should understand without having to be told.”
The Duchess reportedly said, “Then maybe all the hubbub will cease,” when Harry and Meghan recommended to “The Firm” that they be permitted to work for the monarchy while earning their own money.
The report states: “They also decided it would be preferable to accomplish it without involving the UK (or the UK press).” Basically anyplace in the Commonwealth, including Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, was fair game for them.
Anything to just… because we were disrupting the hierarchy’s dynamic by just existing. So here we are. “All right, alright, let’s leave.” She adds, “Happy to,” holding out her hands in a faux defeat.
Meghan claims that what they requested was not “reinventing the wheel” and names a few princes, princesses, and dukes who already had the same setup they requested.
Despite the fact that numerous other family members do the exact same thing, for some reason we were not permitted to do it.
“Why do you suppose that is?” I ask. She immediately responds, “Why do you believe that is?” with a side-eye that implies I should understand without being told.
During the interview, the Duchess was questioned about whether she could forgive both members of the Royal Family and her own family.
I believe that forgiving is incredibly vital, she said to The Cut. To hold onto anger requires a lot more effort. But forgiving someone requires a lot of work. Given that I have the freedom to speak whatever, I have truly made an effort.
The article also makes mention of Thomas Markle, a retired lighting director who now resides in Mexico and is Meghan’s estranged father.
According to the story, Meghan spoke about how two families had been “ripped apart.”
Also in the article, Meghan is quoted as saying: “Harry remarked to me, “I lost my dad in this process.”” Although he has the option, it need not be the same for them as it was for me.