Trump asserts that he should be reinstalled to the presidency… Insists that the FBI and DOJ have been implicated in a “election rigging scheme” and that he should be proclaimed the winner. Biden
Monday, Trump again criticized the DOJ and FBI.
Trump claimed the Justice Department was ‘caught in a massive and determinative Election Rigging Scam,’ and said it should ‘change the results’ of the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden
He asserted that they were “caught in a vast and decisive Election-Fixing Scam.”
He stated that the results of the 2020 presidential election should be altered.
It occurred days after he advocated for ‘declaring the 2020 Election irreversibly damaged and holding a new election.’
Judge Aileen Cannon granted Trump’s request to name a special master.
The independent party would assess both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege.
Trump attorneys had made the demand in a Florida filing.
The judge nominated by Trump stated that the injunction would not affect intelligence assessment
The Justice Department disclosed the scope of the top-secret files discovered in the operation.
According to the ‘Detailed Property Inventory,’ investigators collected around 11,000 documents and 1,800 other things.
Documents include medical records, tax-related correspondence, and financial information.
Former President Donald Trump lashed out at the Justice Department once more on Monday after a court decided in his favor in his bid to go through the results of the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago search, claiming that the agency ‘changed the outcomes’ of the 2000 presidential election.
Trump published the statement on his Truth Social website hours after a judge he appointed in 2000 partially granted his request for a’special master’ to study the materials the FBI collected during a search of his Florida residence.
In addition to allowing Trump to get some records returned or removed from federal use, the order has the impact of delaying an inquiry into the possible mishandling or removal of sensitive government data.
Trump resumed his attacks on law enforcement on Monday, possibly in reference to the FBI’s handling of evidence regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Since the FBI and DOJ have been implicated in a massive and decisive Election Rigging Scam, would they alter the results of the 2020 Presidential Election? They ought to!! Trump authored.
Trump’s remark echoed a blog post he penned last week in response to the demotion of a report regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop by major technology companies.
Former President Donald Trump has demanded that the Justice Department and FBI alter the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. A judge has granted Donald Trump’s request to have a special master analyze the Mar-a-Lago raid records.
‘FBI ENTOMBED THE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP STORY PRIOR TO THE ELECTION KNOWING THAT, HAD THEY NOT, ‘TRUMP WOULD HAVE EASILY WON THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
This is unprecedented levels of FRAUD and ELECTION INTERFERENCE in our country,’ Trump said.
“REMEDY: Declare the rightful winner or, as a minimum solution, declare the 2020 Election irreversibly tainted and hold a fresh election immediately!”
Again, he criticized the bureau by sharing a user who claimed that the FBI raided Barron’s room but never Hunter’s.
Trump concurred with the attitude and wrote, “That’s right!!!”
Trump’s Monday statement followed President Joe Biden’s repeated attacks on ‘extreme’ members of the MAGA movement and ‘Trumpers’ in general.
Trump asserted that the Justice Department was ‘caught in a vast and decisive Election Rigging Scam’ and demanded that it ‘alter the results’ of the 2020 presidential election he lost to Joe Biden.
Since the Mar-a-Lago raid a month ago, Trump has relentlessly criticized the FBI.
Are we going to construct the future, or are we going to dwell on the past? Biden stated at a Milwaukee Labor Day event.
The New York Post reported on Timothy Thibault on Monday, the FBI agent who quit last week after Republicans criticized his handling of the Hunter Biden investigation. According to the paper, insiders named Thibault as the “point man” for former Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski, who attended the final 2020 presidential debate at the invitation of Donald Trump.
After a federal judge in Florida granted Donald Trump’s request to have a special master review the documents seized during the raid on Mar-a-Lago – granting a key demand of the former president and putting the brakes on the government’s investigation – he proposed a rerun of the election, which is not permitted by the Constitution.
Judge Aileen Cannon granted Trump’s request to appoint a special master “to review the seized property for personal items and papers, as well as possibly privileged material subject to claims of attorney-client and/or executive privilege.”
In addition, the judge designated by Trump prohibits the government from “reviewing and exploiting the confiscated materials” until the review is complete.
This provides Trump and his legal team with the added benefit of delaying the rapid-fire processes that have transpired since the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago on August 8. Any prospective appeal by the government could further delay the process.
Judge Cannon issued the order in a ruling on Labor Day, after stunning some legal observers on the previous Saturday with a ruling that signaled her momentary predisposition to grant Trump’s request for a special master.
In a filing in federal court in Florida, Trump’s team filed its initial request after another judge ruled to reveal a heavily redacted version of the document that helped justify the warrant for the FBI to search the former president’s private club.
Trump appointed Judge Aileen Cannon, who was subsequently confirmed in 2020.
The government responded to Trump’s lawsuit in Florida with a scathing 36-page filing and disclosed fresh details about the extent of classified materials discovered at Mar-a-Lago.
They also supplied a photograph acquired by the FBI showed Trump’s office carpeted with ‘Top Secret’ paperwork.
The judge stated that her injunction should not hinder a classification review or intelligence evaluation.
Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines informed two congressional committees that she will brief them on the Mar-a-Lago national security materials.
The judge ordered Trump’s and the government’s attorneys to confer and submit a list of potential special master candidates and a review and remuneration timetable.
Former President Donald Trump’s attorneys wanted a special master to evaluate FBI-seized materials and the return of Trump’s personal goods.
The Justice Department released a photograph of documents obtained during the August 8 search of Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday night.
The judge withheld a decision regarding Trump’s request for the return of property confiscated during the raid.
During its raid, the FBI recovered 33 boxes containing more than 100 secret documents and, according to the petition, discovered classified documents stashed in Trump’s office.
Others were labeled ‘TOP SECRET/SCI’ with bright yellow borders, while one was labeled ‘SECRET/SCI’ with a rust-colored border.
In its own filings, the government ridiculed Trump’s request and stated that its own taint teams had virtually completed their review for attorney-client privilege. In addition, it contended that there was no precedence for a special master to assess executive privilege and that the privilege belonged to the present executive, President Biden.
“After careful review of the parties’ submissions and the unusual circumstances provided, the Court finds that equitable jurisdiction should be exercised over this matter,” Judge Cannon authored.
She concurred with the government that the search, which occurred after months of back-and-forth and in response to a subpoena for other records, did not demonstrate ‘callous contempt for Plaintiff’s fundamental rights.’
She also mentioned records unearthed by a Privilege Review Team indicating that seized materials include’medical documents, tax-related correspondence, and accounting data.’
She stated that the government acknowledged seizing certain personal items that lacked evidentiary value, along with “more than 500 pages of possibly attorney-client privileged material.”
She highlighted a “Detailed Property Inventory” in which the government stated that agents seized “about 11,000 documents and 1,800 other things from the office and storage area” at Mar-a-Lago.
Her decision emphasized the possibility of government leaks.
She said, “In addition to being deprived of potentially significant personal papers, which alone produces a substantial loss, Plaintiff confronts an unquantifiable potential harm as a result of the wrongful revelation of sensitive material to the public.”
The judge also demonstrated concern for Trump’s reputation should he be indicted or even if his house is searched.
As a result of Plaintiff’s past status as President of the United States, the stigma connected with the subject seizure is unique. She noted that a future indictment based in any way on property that should be returned would result in reputational damage of an entirely other scale.
In one point, the judge recognized the “limitations” of her decision, adding that Trump “may not be entitled to return of much of the confiscated property or succeed on his anticipated claims of privilege.” This investigation is ongoing,’ she noted.
She also rejected a government analogy comparing Trump’s efforts to retrieve records belonging to the U.S. government to those of a drug dealer who pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine and then demanded the return of $140,000 confiscated during a raid.
She wrote, “Plaintiff has not pled guilty to any crimes; the Government has not clearly explained how Plaintiff’s hands are unclean with regard to the personal materials seized; and in any event, this is not a situation where there is no room for doubt as to the immediately apparent incriminating nature of the seized material, as in the case of the sale of cocaine.”