…Researched and contributed by Solomon Thomas.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have made a key decision ahead of King Charles’s coronation, with Harry attending the event while Meghan remains in California with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.
According to royal commentator Rafe Heydel-Mankoo, the couple have made an error in not allowing their children, especially Archie, to attend the event, as they may be missing out on memories of a lifetime.
The commentator compared this to Prince Charles’s appearance in photographs from the 1953 coronation, highlighting the idea of a next generation.
Heydel-Mankoo suggested that Meghan may be equating a child’s fourth birthday with the coronation, but emphasized that most kids do not remember their fourth birthday.
The decision made by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to attend King Charles’s coronation separately has been met with criticism from some quarters.
Heydel-Mankoo, a royal commentator, believes that the couple have missed an opportunity by not allowing their children, especially Archie, to attend the event.
He highlights the importance of the next generation, comparing it to the young Prince Charles’s appearance in photographs from the 1953 coronation.
Heydel-Mankoo suggests that Meghan may be equating her child’s fourth birthday with the coronation, which is an “extraordinary miss.”
The Palace has confirmed that Meghan will not be attending the coronation, stating that she will remain in California with their children.
Harry will attend the event, marking his first appearance with the Windsors since his grandmother’s funeral.
Prince Charles is expected to make a brief appearance and then return to the US to be with his family.
The decision not to bring their children to the coronation is a personal one for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
However, Heydel-Mankoo’s comments suggest that this decision may be a missed opportunity for the next generation to be involved in such an important event.
The commentator also emphasizes the importance of tradition and history, particularly in relation to the British monarchy.
Ultimately, it remains to be seen whether this decision will have any long-term implications for the couple or their relationship with the royal family.