Morris dancer who was left in control of her late parents’ £2 million wealth was removed as executor of the estate

Morris dancer who was left in control of her late parents’ £2 million wealth was removed as executor of the estate

After being accused of having her ‘hands in the till,’ a Morris dancer who was left in control of her late parents’ £2 million wealth was removed as executor of the estate.

After Rosina and Charles died in 2012, Dana Conlin and her brother Eugene were assigned to look after their multimillion-pound estates in south Wales.

The will commanded them to manage the family fortune until the children of their deceased brother Daniel were old enough to inherit their combined third of the estate.

But Dana and Eugene — who fell out in 2017 — were accused of using the estate for ‘personal profit’ and have now been sued by their nieces and nephews.

They used the estate credit card for personal purchases and put Dana’s son up for free in an estate property.

Dana devalued her parents’ six-bedroom house by £175,000 after putting off buyers with ‘smelly rubbish’ and ‘full ashtrays’ while living there, the High Court heard.

Now her and her brother have both been removed as executors and trustees by a judge at the London court. Dana was handed a £90,000 costs bil

Morris dancer Dana Conlin (pictured) and her brother Eugene were appointed to look after Rosina and Charles’ multimillion-pound properties in south Wales after they died in 2012. They were accused of using the estate for ‘personal profit’ and were sued by their nieces and nephews

The court heard that the siblings’ mum Rosina died in 2012 and their dad Charles the following year, having left mirror wills.

Their estates included ‘significant assets’ including Bell House, in Magor, Caldicot, comprising 11 commercial units and worth an unknown seven-figure sum.

They also left development land worth £1.2mmillion, and the couple’s home, White Heather, in Penhow, which later sold for £650,000.

Charles and Rosina had four children, but only Dana and Eugene are still alive.

Daniel’s three children, Shannon Roberts, 27, Kitty Conlin, 25, and Ethan Conlin 21, are now entitled to inherit just over a third of the estate between them.

But Dana and Eugene, who had each been left a quarter share, are the executors and trustees and have still not cashed in the assets in the estate after a drastic falling out between the pair in 2017.

They were dragged to court last month by their nieces and nephews, who accused them of mismanaging the estate and using it to cover their personal spending, despite each having already been handed £50,000 of their inheritance.

James Poole, lawyer for the nieces and nephews, told judge Master William Hansen that they say both their aunt and uncle have been spending estate money.

The court heard that the siblings’ mum Rosina died in 2012 and their dad Charles the following year, having left mirror wills.

Their estates included ‘significant assets’ including Bell House, in Magor, Caldicot, comprising 11 commercial units and worth an unknown seven-figure sum.

They also left development land worth £1.2mmillion, and the couple’s home, White Heather, in Penhow, which later sold for £650,000.

Charles and Rosina had four children, but only Dana and Eugene are still alive.

Daniel’s three children, Shannon Roberts, 27, Kitty Conlin, 25, and Ethan Conlin 21, are now entitled to inherit just over a third of the estate between them.

But Dana and Eugene, who had each been left a quarter share, are the executors and trustees and have still not cashed in the assets in the estate after a drastic falling out between the pair in 2017.

They were dragged to court last month by their nieces and nephews, who accused them of mismanaging the estate and using it to cover their personal spending, despite each having already been handed £50,000 of their inheritance.

James Poole, lawyer for the nieces and nephews, told judge Master William Hansen that they say both their aunt and uncle have been spending estate money.

The court heard that the Dana's mum Rosina (left) died in 2012 and their dad Charles (right) the following year

This exemplifies the level of dysfunction with which these trusts have been administered…it’s frankly absurd,’ he added.

Giving Dana’s side, he added: ‘Dana says it’s Eugene’s fault. She denies she had her hands in the till. Her position is that she hasn’t done anything wrong.’

Eugene however admits to having taken money from the estate and offered to quit his roles as executor and trustee and to pay back what he has taken, he said.

‘His position is that both defendants have profited from their roles as executors,’ he continued.

‘He is offering to pay it back. Dana’s position is very clearly that she doesn’t have to pay a penny.’

The barrister told the judge that ‘frightening costs’ had been run up through the family fight having to come to court.

But Gareth Thomas, Dana’s lawyer, told the judge that she finds the situation ’embarrassing and frustrating’.

Arguing that she should be allowed to remain in her positions of responsibility and Eugene alone removed, he said removal of an executor is a ‘drastic step only to be taken in a very clear cut case’.

Dana says she was simply living at the house until it could be sold and denies devaluing it during her occupation.

Shannon Roberts
Kitty Conlin
Ethan Conlin

Daniel’s three children, Shannon Roberts (left), 27, Kitty Conlin (centre), 25, and Ethan Conlin (right), 21, are now entitled to inherit just over a third of the estate between them

‘Dana completely denies this,’ said her barrister. ‘She says the house was only ever worth £625,000.’

Alex Troup, for Eugene, told the judge there are ‘many reasons’ why Dana should not remain as trustee and executor of the estate.

‘Eugene wants both him and his sister to be removed…there is a large degree of hostility between Dana and Eugene,’ he said.

Removing both from their roles in managing the estate, Master Hansen said there appeared to be ‘very significant issues’ in the way they had administered the estates.

The judge added that the nieces and nephews have ‘numerous grounds of complaint against Eugene and Dana individually,’ including that Eugene ‘has consistently failed to administer the estates in a competent manner’.

In Dana’s case there is ‘a potential claim for occupation rent arising from occupation of White Heather for about five years’ and the ‘allegation that it sold at an undervalue’.

He said: ‘This situation cannot be allowed to persist any longer. I therefore propose to make an order removing both defendants as executors and trustees.’

He said that the costs run up by the nieces and nephews should be awarded against both defendants, but that Eugene would get indemnity as an executor so his costs would be paid by the estate.

But the judge stripped Dana of her indemnity, meaning that £90,000 will come out of her share personally.