A outraged personal trainer claims she confronted the men who photographed her topless on a beach, only to be ‘gaslighted’ and informed they were simply photographing the ‘landscape.’
Lily Cook and her sister were discreetly photographed on a beach in Sydney’s eastern suburbs on November 12; they discovered the images only hours later.
As the photograph had been taken in public, no charges were filed.
Ms. Cook’s attempts to hold the group of men ethically accountable and obtain an apology were likewise unsuccessful.
After the ‘close up’ photograph began circulating in one of the PT’s social groups, she was able to find out those responsible.
When she approached the men about the photograph, they denied involvement and indicated she was exaggerating the situation, stating that the image had been cropped from a bigger photograph of the beach.
By analyzing the images, however, Ms. Cook was able to refute their assertions and conclude that she was the intended target.
She said on Instagram, “These males (and I use this term liberally) opted to manufacture and corroborate further lies, embellish stories, and gaslight me rather than apologize and confess this harsh and clear truth.”
I can’t help but imagine how different this entire process would be if they had the courage and decency to take responsibility for their acts and how it might affect a woman.
Ms. Cook reported seeing three males at the beach, two of whom she knew socially and had many mutual friends with. The men’s girlfriends joined them afterwards.
She always tanned without a top, but she did not feel comfortable tanning when the males were present, so she waited until they left.
Later that evening, though, the fitness instructor received a message from a friend inquiring if she had been shirtless at the beach, along with a ‘close up’ photo of her lying on the sand.
She stated, “The individual who sent me the photo confirmed who sent him the photo.”
This is when I realized that a photo of me had been taken and distributed without my permission.
Ms. Cook sent a group message to the males and their girlfriends, who claimed she was captured inadvertently in a wider landscape snap posted to an Instagram story by one of their pals.
She stated that this was a deception because she and her sister were lying down in the shot, but her sister was seated in the posted photo.
Due to the image quality and position, it was evident that one of the men had crept up on her to capture a close-up of her shirtless.
Ms. Cook reported that a man eventually admitted to stealing the photo from the phone of the original photographer and sending it to two others, who then spread it further.
However, the man refused to speak with police.
She stated that no one engaged in the incident ever apologized for the “disgusting, perverted, and childish” act.
Ms. Cook stated that learning a photo was posted on group conversations had a devastating effect on her mental health.
“It is a time in my life that will haunt me forever,” she added, promising to speak up after hearing from other women who experienced the same thing.
“The capturing and distribution of an explicit image of a woman without her agreement or knowledge is both disgusting and unlawful.” I am taking a stand on this topic.
On Instagram, sexologist and girlfriend of tennis player and 2022 Australian of the Year Dylan Alcott Chantelle Otten expressed her support.
She said, “This is so offensive and repugnant that I cannot fathom your feelings as this unfolded over the days.”
“We are all in your corner, they are the problem, and you are incredibly courageous to have written this piece.” I hope this is not pushed under the rug, but dealt with appropriately.
According to the Daily Telegraph, Ms. Cook reported the incident to police, but no charges were filed against the allegedly responsible men.
She remarked, “I’m disappointed because I expected action to be taken.”
Although there are regulations in place to protect victims of “revenge porn” – the spreading of sexually graphic photos of an individual without their knowledge, generally by a former partner – they do not apply in her situation.
Police stated that taking a photograph of a person in a public location was “usually not an offense” and was only illegal if done in private.
‘Of course, people should be entitled to express themselves in any way they like,’ a senior officer told the Telegraph. ‘Unfortunately, in this social media era, others get a joy out of either daring to take images when people are unaware or for the thrill of uploading.
Another officer who works in the field of sex crimes stated that the conclusion of each case depends on the specific circumstances, with instances of youngsters being photographed by strangers necessitating further inquiry.
Matt Ward, a criminal defense attorney, stated that the law needed to catch up to how individuals were utilizing technology, since the line between public and private was blurring due to the growing sharing of content on social media sites.
RMIT Professor Nicola Henry, an authority on image-based sexual abuse, concurred, stating that the complexities of consent had not yet been represented in the law.
She referenced the March incident in which Married At First Sight contestant Domenica Calarco’s OnlyFans images were shared with the group without her permission.
Professor Henry stated that uploading intimate photos to a website did not necessarily constitute consent for their distribution.
Ms. Cook stated that she struggled to comprehend the motivation behind taking and sharing the photo, but speculated that those involved may have felt empowered.
She felt empowered to share her story and advocate for other women with comparable experiences.
She wrote, “I am sharing my experience because I know there are other women and girls who have experienced the same violation and who, like me, feel overwhelmed by pain and the weight of social stigma.”
I want children to understand that we have a bond and may draw strength from one another.
The NSW Police stated, “Distributing photos, especially of an intimate nature, without consent can have a detrimental effect on a person’s health and mental well-being, and may result in criminal action.”
‘Images of this sort can be disseminated and watched with growing ease and can go viral within minutes, causing victims long-term harm.
Even in a public place, the privacy of others must be respected, and anyone who feels unsafe due to the acts of others must report the incident to the authorities.
»Topless sunbather Lily Cook confronted the individuals who snapped her photo without her consent«