A court has found that five care home employees who lost their jobs for refusing to get the Covid vaccination were treated appropriately.
One of the largest healthcare organizations in Britain, Barchester Healthcare, fired five healthcare professionals for refusing the Covid-19 immunization without a valid medical reason.
The home dismissed the unvaccinated workers to safeguard the lives of patients who were clinically susceptible, according to the employment court, who rejected charges of unfair dismissal.
The nurse, laundry worker, and three care assistants said they shouldn’t have been fired for declining to participate in the company’s vaccination program since they rejected the vaccine because of their spiritual and philosophical convictions.
The employment tribunal, which was conducted in Leeds, decided that the employees had not been sacked for no cause, despite one of them believing that “God would protect” her from the coronavirus.
It was determined that the healthcare provider’s “legitimate objective” was to reduce the likelihood that residents and employees would die or suffer a severe disease, and that taking this action was “essential in a democratic society.”
“[Barchester Healthcare] was striving to minimize the danger of mortality, placing a real priority on the preservation of any resident’s life,” stated employment judge Neil Maidment.
Any negative behavior on the part of a caregiver “could have been considered as worrisome.”
The corporation “believed its policy of (subject to medical exemption) exclusively hiring vaccinated care home personnel would save lives,” according to Judge Maidment, who acknowledged that the basis for firing the employees was “genuine and significant” despite being “unique.”
The panel finds that any interference with human rights in these particular circumstances was proportional, he added.
Barchester Healthcare has more than 250 care facilities offering residential and nursing care, seven licensed hospitals, and more than 17,000 employees nationwide.
Hearing participants were informed that the care provider saw it as a “honor” for workers to get the vaccination before members of the general public.
At the time, CEO Pete Calveley told colleagues that acquiring the vaccination and guarding vulnerable residents at care homes was part of a “moral and ethical responsibility to do the right thing.”
“[Barchester Healthcare] of course never offered, for instance, vaccination by force,” remarked Judge Maidment.
It was careful to reiterate throughout the policy’s introduction that it understood vaccines could not be compelled, that vaccination was a personal decision, that permission had to be provided voluntarily, and that assent to further immunizations may be revoked at any time.
“Vaccination was not at this time required by law, but none of the claims were physically coerced into receiving vaccinations.
Despite the fact that they would not have seen it as a free decision given the clear consequences of losing their jobs, they did have a choice.
More than 10% of all residents at Barchester Healthcare passed away in 2020 with a reported cause of Covid.
Additionally, six employees perished for causes connected to Covid.
Ilona Motiejuniene, who provided personal care to residents at a home in Dagenham, East London, was one of those seeking unjust dismissal.
The panel heard her claim that she was “100% protected” against Covid because God “perfectly constructed the immune system.”
Mrs. Motiejuniene objected to the shot, claiming that she had “done her own research” and thought “the shot may harm a person.”
She said that since she worked “hard to enhance her welfare,” her immune system had been strengthened.
The care assistant claimed that when she filed an appeal against her termination and was subsequently questioned by a senior management about her views, she experienced discrimination and harassment.
The appeals officer, regional director for Barchester Andrea Crowley, reportedly questioned her, “You want me to reinstate you on the basis that God made us perfectly and you haven’t experienced it,” according to what the panel heard. There must be something more. and “You think God will defend you?”
Being an observant Christian herself, Ms. Crowley’s questioning to Mrs. Motiejuniene made her feel “dumb,” leading her to believe the officer was “laughing on the inside” at her beliefs.
Giorgia Masiero, a different care assistant, told the tribunal she would not get the vaccination because she thought “her body and immune system were able to fend off any illness.”
She said that she had “a lifetime spiritual phase” and that she had “been on a path of natural health for over 20 years, ate healthily and no genetically modified food.”
She said that since she was a Catholic, she “objected to any vaccination that employed aborted foetal cells and was genetically manipulated by science” and that the “mainstream media” was “silencing” certain physicians for holding unusual viewpoints.
For electing not to get the vaccination, Miss Masiero, who works in Brentwood, Essex, stated that “as a sensible and powerful human being, she felt she was being treated like a second-class citizen.”
Joanna Hussain, a laundry assistant who worked in Derby, refused the immunization because she had “many sensitivities” and because, according to her Muslim beliefs, “the vaccine included foetuses.”
She also sent her employer a copy of the Nuremberg Code, “which had the proclaimed objective of safeguarding human beings from undergoing the type of brutality and exploitation faced by captives at concentration camps,” the trial heard, equating the immunization program with Nazi medical experiments.
Sammy-jo Chadwick, an assistant at the same facility caring for patients with complex needs and learning problems, stated she did not trust the vaccination. Galina Dimitrova, a licensed nurse and deputy manager in Hull, “thought the shots to be experimental.”
Their arguments were all rejected. All charges of unjust dismissal were rejected by the panel.
The accusations of direct and indirect harassment linked to religion and belief made by Mrs. Hussain and Mrs. Motiejuniene as well as Mrs. Motiejuniene failed.
»Five nursing home employees were dismissed for refusing Covid«