Michael Avenatti was sentenced to four years in jail on Thursday for defrauding his client Stormy Daniels

Michael Avenatti was sentenced to four years in jail on Thursday for defrauding his client Stormy Daniels

Michael Avenatti was sentenced to four years in jail on Thursday for defrauding his client Stormy Daniels, the porn star who launched his career, of hundreds of thousands of dollars in book royalties.

The California lawyer, who is now jailed, heard his punishment in federal court in Manhattan, where Judge Jesse M. Furman ruled Avenatti will serve an additional two-and-a-half years in prison on top of the two-and-a-half years he is already doing for previous fraud conviction.

Avenatti’s crime against Daniels was committed “out of desperation” when his legal company was floundering, according to the judge. He described Avenatti’s actions as “craven and outrageous,” blaming them on “blind ambition.”

Prior to sentencing being announced, Avenatti, wearing his prison uniform, choked up several times as he delivered a lengthy statement, saying he had ‘disappointed scores of people and failed in a cataclysmic way.’

He told the judge: ‘I have destroyed my career, my relationships, and my reputation.

‘I’ve brought embarrassment and ridicule upon myself and innocent third parties, including my family, my children, my friends, and the legal profession.’

He appeared in court wearing a beige prison outfit over a long-sleeved T-shirt after the judge denied his request to wear a suit.

Former attorney Michael Avenatti is seen in this court sketch in the courtroom before he is sentenced to four years in prison for defrauding Stormy DanielsMichael Avenatti stands beside his lawyer Bob Baum as U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman sentences him to four years in prisonMichael Avenatti was sentenced Thursday to four years in prison for cheating client Stormy Daniels (pictured together in 2018)The judge said Avenatti's crime against Daniels was made 'out of desperation' when his law firm was struggling (Avenatti and Daniels are pictured together in 2018)

At trial earlier this year, Avenatti represented himself, cross-examining his former client for hours about their experiences in early 2018, when she signed a book deal that provided an $800,000 payout. Prosecutors said he illegally pocketed about $300,000 of her advance on ‘Full Disclosure,’ published in fall 2018.

The book’s publication came at a time when Avenatti’s law practice was failing financially even as he appeared regularly on cable television news channels.

In the appearances, he attacked then-President Donald Trump as he represented Daniels in lawsuits meant to free her from a $130,000 hush payment she received shortly before the 2016 presidential election to remain silent about a tryst she said she had with Trump a decade earlier. Trump denied it.

Daniels was not in court. A lawyer spoke on her behalf, saying it was ‘truly shocking’ that Avenatti tried to portray himself as a champion of his clients during his statement.

His conviction for aggravated identity theft required a mandatory two-year prison sentence. He´s already serving a two-and-a-half year sentence for trying to extort Nike. Avenatti was convicted of threatening to ruin the shoemaker´s reputation if it did not pay him up to $25 million.

And he faces a retrial in California on charges that he cheated clients and others of millions of dollars there.

In a presentence submission, Avenatti’s lawyers cited an apology letter Avenatti recently wrote to Daniels in which he said: ‘I am truly sorry.’

But prosecutors in a sentencing submission last week urged that that he should face ‘substantial’ additional time in prison for a wire fraud conviction and criticized his apology letter, saying the 51-year-old failed to apologize for his actual crime.

The California lawyer is already serving a two-and-a-half year sentence for trying to extort Nike. Avenatti was convicted of threatening to ruin the shoemaker´s reputation if it did not pay him up to $25 million

And they recalled that during ‘an extremely lengthy’ cross-examination, he ‘berated his victim for lewd language and being a difficult client, questioned her invasively about marital and familial difficulties, and sought to cast her as crazy, much as he did during the course of his fraud to prevent her own agent and publisher from responding to her pleas for help.’

‘The defendant certainly had every right to defend himself at trial. But he is not entitled to a benefit for showing remorse, having done so only when convenient and only after seeking to humiliate his victim at a public trial, and denigrating and insulting her for months to her agent and publisher while holding himself out as taking up her cause against the powerful who might have taken advantage of her,’ prosecutors wrote.