»Read Standard Version«
Last week, the Bank of England was compelled to get into the government bond market out of concern that a fire sale of £50 billion may start a financial catastrophe.
Deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe defended the Bank’s actions in a letter to MPs, stating that officials intervened to stop a “self-reinforcing spiral” that might have resulted in a market catastrophe after Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-Budget on September 23.
As a result, the value of liability-driven investment (LDI) funds may have fallen to zero, potentially causing millions of pension investors to lose money in their retirement accounts.
According to Sir Jon, the confusion might have caused “serious disruption of key financing markets and resultant worldwide financial instability” had the Bank of England not “worked overnight” on a £65 billion rescue on September 27.
Due to recent market volatility, LDIs, a previously obscure investing tactic, have become the focal point of the pension fund scandal.
Final-salary pension plans employ LDIs to make sure they have adequate funds for future distributions. They “hedge” against changes in interest rates, inflation, and currencies by letting pension funds accumulate debt in order to purchase additional gilts, or U.K. government bonds.
Gilts, in which an investor borrows money to the government and receives a “yield” in return, are seen as dependable since they fluctuate in line with forecasts for inflation and interest rates.
However, issues arise when the value of gilts declines, as it did in recent weeks. The managers of their LDI pots urged pension funds to contribute more money since losses on the gilt market escalated beyond usual financial safeguards.
As a result, they were forced to sell gilts, which further decreased their value.
If the chaos had persisted, many LDI funds would not have been able to generate enough money to cover expenses, according to Sir Jon. Pension fund investments in such combined LDI funds, he said, would be worthless.
They started flog their current government bonds as a result. Sir Jon painted a chaotic image when he said that the increase in gilt yields, which rise as their price falls, “was more than twice as great as the largest shift since 2000.”
He said that LDI funds and other dealers would have been forced to sell long-term gilts worth “at least £50 billion in a short period of time” instead of the customary £12 billion a day if the Bank had not intervened.
In response, Mr. Kwarteng said that concerns about a worldwide recession and increasing US interest rates were to blame for the market’s turbulence. On Monday, he remarked on LBC, “What occurred in the gilt market has had nothing to do with [the mini-Budget].” There were several things, as said.
The Chancellor met with mortgage lenders yesterday to discuss the current financial situation. He is encouraged to take into account expanding the mortgage guarantee program, which shields lenders from losses on customers who are first-time homebuyers.
Although it was implemented in reaction to the epidemic, its expiration date is December. During the crunch discussions, the average five-year fixed rate mortgage contract slipped beyond the 6.02% mark for the first time since February 2010.